|
Berkeley DB version 4.8.30 |
|||||||||
PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |
java.lang.Object com.sleepycat.persist.SecondaryIndex<SK,PK,E>
public class SecondaryIndex<SK,PK,E>
The secondary index for an entity class and a secondary key.
SecondaryIndex
objects are thread-safe. Multiple threads may
safely call the methods of a shared SecondaryIndex
object.
SecondaryIndex
implements EntityIndex
to map the
secondary key type (SK) to the entity type (E). In other words, entities
are accessed by secondary key values.
The SecondaryKey
annotation may be used to define a secondary key
as shown in the following example.
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE) String department; String name; private Employee() {} }
Before obtaining a SecondaryIndex
, the PrimaryIndex
must
be obtained for the entity class. To obtain the SecondaryIndex
call
EntityStore.getSecondaryIndex
, passing
the primary index, the secondary key class and the secondary key name. For
example:
EntityStore store = new EntityStore(...);PrimaryIndex<Long,Employee>
primaryIndex = store.getPrimaryIndex(Long.class, Employee.class);SecondaryIndex<String,Long,Employee>
secondaryIndex = store.getSecondaryIndex(primaryIndex, String.class, "department");
Since SecondaryIndex
implements the EntityIndex
interface, it shares the common index methods for retrieving and deleting
entities, opening cursors and using transactions. See EntityIndex
for more information on these topics.
SecondaryIndex
does not provide methods for inserting
and updating entities. That must be done using the PrimaryIndex
.
Note that a SecondaryIndex
has three type parameters <SK,PK,E>
or in the example <String,Long,Employee>
while a PrimaryIndex
has only two type parameters <PK,E>
or <Long,Employee>
. This is because a SecondaryIndex
has an extra
level of mapping: It maps from secondary key to primary key, and then from
primary key to entity. For example, consider this entity:
ID | Department | Name |
---|---|---|
1 | Engineering | Jane Smith |
The PrimaryIndex
maps from id directly to the entity, or from
primary key 1 to the "Jane Smith" entity in the example. The SecondaryIndex
maps from department to id, or from secondary key
"Engineering" to primary key 1 in the example, and then uses the PrimaryIndex
to map from the primary key to the entity.
Because of this extra type parameter and extra level of mapping, a SecondaryIndex
can provide more than one mapping, or view, of the entities
in the primary index. The main mapping of a SecondaryIndex
is to
map from secondary key (SK) to entity (E), or in the example, from the
String department key to the Employee entity. The SecondaryIndex
itself, by implementing EntityIndex<SK,E>
, provides this
mapping.
The second mapping provided by SecondaryIndex
is from secondary
key (SK) to primary key (PK), or in the example, from the String department
key to the Long id key. The keysIndex
method provides this
mapping. When accessing the keys index, the primary key is returned rather
than the entity. When only the primary key is needed and not the entire
entity, using the keys index is less expensive than using the secondary
index because the primary index does not have to be accessed.
The third mapping provided by SecondaryIndex
is from primary key
(PK) to entity (E), for the subset of entities having a given secondary key
(SK). This mapping is provided by the subIndex(SK)
method. A
sub-index is convenient when you are interested in working with the subset
of entities having a particular secondary key value, for example, all
employees in a given department.
All three mappings, along with the mapping provided by the PrimaryIndex
, are shown using example data in the EntityIndex
interface documentation. See EntityIndex
for more information.
Note that when using an index, keys and values are stored and retrieved by value not by reference. In other words, if an entity object is stored and then retrieved, or retrieved twice, each object will be a separate instance. For example, in the code below the assertion will always fail.
MyKey key = ...; MyEntity entity1 = index.get(key); MyEntity entity2 = index.get(key); assert entity1 == entity2; // always fails!
A ONE_TO_ONE
relationship, although less
common than other types of relationships, is the simplest type of
relationship. A single entity is related to a single secondary key value.
For example:
@Entity
class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=ONE_TO_ONE)
String ssn;
String name;
private Employee() {}
}
SecondaryIndex<String,Long,Employee>
employeeBySsn =
store.getSecondaryIndex(primaryIndex, String.class, "ssn");
With a ONE_TO_ONE
relationship, the
secondary key must be unique; in other words, no two entities may have the
same secondary key value. If an attempt is made to store an entity having
the same secondary key value as another existing entity, a DatabaseException
will be thrown.
Because the secondary key is unique, it is useful to lookup entities by
secondary key using EntityIndex.get(K)
. For example:
Employee employee = employeeBySsn.get(mySsn);
A MANY_TO_ONE
relationship is the most
common type of relationship. One or more entities is related to a single
secondary key value. For example:
@Entity
class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE)
String department;
String name;
private Employee() {}
}
SecondaryIndex<String,Long,Employee>
employeeByDepartment =
store.getSecondaryIndex(primaryIndex, String.class, "department");
With a MANY_TO_ONE
relationship, the
secondary key is not required to be unique; in other words, more than one
entity may have the same secondary key value. In this example, more than
one employee may belong to the same department.
The most convenient way to access the employees in a given department is by using a sub-index. For example:
EntityIndex<Long,Entity>
subIndex = employeeByDepartment.subIndex(myDept);EntityCursor<Employee>
cursor = subIndex.entities(); try { for (Employee entity : cursor) { // Do something with the entity... } } finally { cursor.close(); }
In a ONE_TO_MANY
relationship, a single
entity is related to one or more secondary key values. For example:
@Entity
class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=ONE_TO_MANY)
Set<String> emailAddresses = new HashSet<String>;
String name;
private Employee() {}
}
SecondaryIndex<String,Long,Employee>
employeeByEmail =
store.getSecondaryIndex(primaryIndex, String.class, "emailAddresses");
With a ONE_TO_MANY
relationship, the
secondary key must be unique; in other words, no two entities may have the
same secondary key value. In this example, no two employees may have the
same email address. If an attempt is made to store an entity having the
same secondary key value as another existing entity, a DatabaseException
will be thrown.
Because the secondary key is unique, it is useful to lookup entities by
secondary key using EntityIndex.get(K)
. For example:
Employee employee = employeeByEmail.get(myEmailAddress);
The secondary key field for a ONE_TO_MANY
relationship must be an array or collection type. To access
the email addresses of an employee, simply access the collection field
directly. For example:
Employee employee = primaryIndex.get(1); // Get the entity by primary key employee.emailAddresses.add(myNewEmail); // Add an email address primaryIndex.putNoReturn(1, employee); // Update the entity
In a MANY_TO_MANY
relationship, one
or more entities is related to one or more secondary key values. For
example:
@Entity
class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_MANY)
Set<String> organizations = new HashSet<String>;
String name;
private Employee() {}
}
SecondaryIndex<String,Long,Employee>
employeeByOrganization =
store.getSecondaryIndex(primaryIndex, String.class, "organizations");
With a MANY_TO_MANY
relationship, the
secondary key is not required to be unique; in other words, more than one
entity may have the same secondary key value. In this example, more than
one employee may belong to the same organization.
The most convenient way to access the employees in a given organization is by using a sub-index. For example:
EntityIndex<Long,Entity>
subIndex = employeeByOrganization.subIndex(myOrg);EntityCursor<Employee>
cursor = subIndex.entities(); try { for (Employee entity : cursor) { // Do something with the entity... } } finally { cursor.close(); }
The secondary key field for a MANY_TO_MANY
relationship must be an array or collection type. To access
the organizations of an employee, simply access the collection field
directly. For example:
Employee employee = primaryIndex.get(1); // Get the entity by primary key employee.organizations.remove(myOldOrg); // Remove an organization primaryIndex.putNoReturn(1, employee); // Update the entity
In all the examples above the secondary key is treated only as a simple
value, such as a String
department field. In many cases, that is
sufficient. But in other cases, you may wish to constrain the secondary
keys of one entity class to be valid primary keys of another entity
class. For example, a Department entity may also be defined:
@Entity class Department { @PrimaryKey String name; String missionStatement; private Department() {} }
You may wish to constrain the department field values of the Employee class in the examples above to be valid primary keys of the Department entity class. In other words, you may wish to ensure that the department field of an Employee will always refer to a valid Department entity.
You can implement this constraint yourself by validating the department field before you store an Employee. For example:
PrimaryIndex<String,Department>
departmentIndex =
store.getPrimaryIndex(String.class, Department.class);
void storeEmployee(Employee employee) throws DatabaseException {
if (departmentIndex.contains(employee.department)) {
primaryIndex.putNoReturn(employee);
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Department does not exist: " +
employee.department);
}
}
Or, instead you could define the Employee department field as a foreign key, and this validation will be done for you when you attempt to store the Employee entity. For example:
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Department.class) String department; String name; private Employee() {} }
The relatedEntity=Department.class
above defines the department
field as a foreign key that refers to a Department entity. Whenever a
Employee entity is stored, its department field value will be checked to
ensure that a Department entity exists with that value as its primary key.
If no such Department entity exists, then a DatabaseException
is
thrown, causing the transaction to be aborted (assuming that transactions
are used).
This begs the question: What happens when a Department entity is deleted while one or more Employee entities have department fields that refer to the deleted department's primary key? If the department were allowed to be deleted, the foreign key constraint for the Employee department field would be violated, because the Employee department field would refer to a department that does not exist.
By default, when this situation arises the system does not allow the
department to be deleted. Instead, a DatabaseException
is thrown,
causing the transaction to be aborted. In this case, in order to delete a
department, the department field of all Employee entities must first be
updated to refer to a different existing department, or set to null. This
is the responsibility of the application.
There are two additional ways of handling deletion of a Department
entity. These alternatives are configured using the SecondaryKey.onRelatedEntityDelete()
annotation property. Setting this
property to DeleteAction.NULLIFY
causes the Employee department
field to be automatically set to null when the department they refer to is
deleted. This may or may not be desirable, depending on application
policies. For example:
@Entity
class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Department.class,
onRelatedEntityDelete=NULLIFY)
String department;
String name;
private Employee() {}
}
The DeleteAction.CASCADE
value, on the other hand, causes the
Employee entities to be automatically deleted when the department they refer
to is deleted. This is probably not desirable in this particular example,
but is useful for parent-child relationships. For example:
@Entity
class Order {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
String description;
private Order() {}
}
@Entity
class OrderItem {
@PrimaryKey
long id;
@SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Order.class,
onRelatedEntityDelete=CASCADE)
long orderId;
String description;
private OrderItem() {}
}
The OrderItem orderId field refers to its "parent" Order entity. When an Order entity is deleted, it may be useful to automatically delete its "child" OrderItem entities.
For more information, see SecondaryKey.onRelatedEntityDelete()
.
When there is a conceptual Many-to-One relationship such as Employee to Department as illustrated in the examples above, the relationship may be implemented either as Many-to-One in the Employee class or as One-to-Many in the Department class.
Here is the Many-to-One approach.
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Department.class) String department; String name; private Employee() {} } @Entity class Department { @PrimaryKey String name; String missionStatement; private Department() {} }
And here is the One-to-Many approach.
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; String name; private Employee() {} } @Entity class Department { @PrimaryKey String name; String missionStatement; @SecondaryKey(relate=ONE_TO_MANY, relatedEntity=Employee.class) Set<Long> employees = new HashSet<Long>; private Department() {} }
Which approach is best? The Many-to-One approach better handles large number of entities on the to-Many side of the relationship because it doesn't store a collection of keys as an entity field. With Many-to-One a Btree is used to store the collection of keys and the Btree can easily handle very large numbers of keys. With One-to-Many, each time a related key is added or removed the entity on the One side of the relationship, along with the complete collection of related keys, must be updated. Therefore, if large numbers of keys may be stored per relationship, Many-to-One is recommended.
If the number of entities per relationship is not a concern, then you may wish to choose the approach that is most natural in your application data model. For example, if you think of a Department as containing employees and you wish to modify the Department object each time an employee is added or removed, then you may wish to store a collection of Employee keys in the Department object (One-to-Many).
Note that if you have a One-to-Many relationship and there is no related entity, then you don't have a choice -- you have to use One-to-Many because there is no entity on the to-Many side of the relationship where a Many-to-One key could be defined. An example is the Employee to email addresses relationship discussed above:
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=ONE_TO_MANY) Set<String> emailAddresses = new HashSet<String>; String name; private Employee() {} }
For sake of argument imagine that each employee has thousands of email addresses and employees frequently add and remove email addresses. To avoid the potential performance problems associated with updating the Employee entity every time an email address is added or removed, you could create an EmployeeEmailAddress entity and use a Many-to-One relationship as shown below:
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; String name; private Employee() {} } @Entity class EmployeeEmailAddress { @PrimaryKey String emailAddress; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Employee.class) long employeeId; private EmployeeEmailAddress() {} }
As discussed in the section above, one drawback of a to-Many relationship (One-to-Many was discussed above and Many-to-Many is discussed here) is that it requires storing a collection of keys in an entity. Each time a key is added or removed, the containing entity must be updated. This has potential performance problems when there are large numbers of entities on the to-Many side of the relationship, in other words, when there are large numbers of keys in each secondary key field collection.
If you have a Many-to-Many relationship with a reasonably small number of entities on one side of the relationship and a large number of entities on the other side, you can avoid the potential performance problems by defining the secondary key field on the side with a small number of entities.
For example, in an Employee-to-Organization relationship, the number of organizations per employee will normally be reasonably small but the number of employees per organization may be very large. Therefore, to avoid potential performance problems, the secondary key field should be defined in the Employee class as shown below.
@Entity class Employee { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_MANY, relatedEntity=Organization.class) Set<String> organizations = new HashSet<String>; String name; private Employee() {} } @Entity class Organization { @PrimaryKey String name; String description; }
If instead a Set<Long> members
key had been defined in the
Organization class, this set could potentially have a large number of
elements and performance problems could result.
If you have a Many-to-Many relationship with a large number of entities on both sides of the relationship, you can avoid the potential performance problems by using a relationship entity. A relationship entity defines the relationship between two other entities using two Many-to-One relationships.
Imagine a relationship between cars and trucks indicating whenever a particular truck was passed on the road by a particular car. A given car may pass a large number of trucks and a given truck may be passed by a large number of cars. First look at a Many-to-Many relationship between these two entities:
@Entity class Car { @PrimaryKey String licenseNumber; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_MANY, relatedEntity=Truck.class) Set<String> trucksPassed = new HashSet<String>; String color; private Car() {} } @Entity class Truck { @PrimaryKey String licenseNumber; int tons; private Truck() {} }
With the Many-to-Many approach above, the trucksPassed
set could
potentially have a large number of elements and performance problems could
result.
To apply the relationship entity approach we define a new entity class named CarPassedTruck representing a single truck passed by a single car. We remove the secondary key from the Car class and use two secondary keys in the CarPassedTruck class instead.
@Entity class Car { @PrimaryKey String licenseNumber; String color; private Car() {} } @Entity class Truck { @PrimaryKey String licenseNumber; int tons; private Truck() {} } @Entity class CarPassedTruck { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Car.class) String carLicense; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Truck.class) String truckLicense; private CarPassedTruck() {} }
The CarPassedTruck entity can be used to access the relationship by car license or by truck license.
You may use the relationship entity approach because of the potential performance problems mentioned above. Or, you may choose to use this approach in order to store other information about the relationship. For example, if for each car that passes a truck you wish to record how much faster the car was going than the truck, then a relationship entity is the logical place to store that property. In the example below the speedDifference property is added to the CarPassedTruck class.
@Entity class CarPassedTruck { @PrimaryKey long id; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Car.class) String carLicense; @SecondaryKey(relate=MANY_TO_ONE, relatedEntity=Truck.class) String truckLicense; int speedDifference; private CarPassedTruck() {} }
Be aware that the relationship entity approach adds overhead compared to Many-to-Many. There is one additional entity and one additional secondary key. These factors should be weighed against its advantages and the relevant application access patterns should be considered.
Constructor Summary | |
---|---|
SecondaryIndex(SecondaryDatabase database,
Database keysDatabase,
PrimaryIndex<PK,E> primaryIndex,
Class<SK> secondaryKeyClass,
EntryBinding<SK> secondaryKeyBinding)
Creates a secondary index without using an EntityStore . |
Method Summary | |
---|---|
boolean |
contains(K key)
Checks for existence of a key in this index. |
boolean |
contains(Transaction txn,
K key,
LockMode lockMode)
Checks for existence of a key in this index. |
long |
count()
Returns a non-transactional count of the entities in this index. |
boolean |
delete(K key)
Deletes all entities with a given index key. |
boolean |
delete(Transaction txn,
K key)
Deletes all entities with a given index key. |
EntityCursor<E> |
entities()
Opens a cursor for traversing all entities in this index. |
EntityCursor<E> |
entities(K fromKey,
boolean fromInclusive,
K toKey,
boolean toInclusive)
Opens a cursor for traversing entities in a key range. |
EntityCursor<E> |
entities(Transaction txn,
CursorConfig config)
Opens a cursor for traversing all entities in this index. |
EntityCursor<E> |
entities(Transaction txn,
K fromKey,
boolean fromInclusive,
K toKey,
boolean toInclusive,
CursorConfig config)
Opens a cursor for traversing entities in a key range. |
E |
get(SK key)
Gets an entity via a key of this index. |
E |
get(Transaction txn,
SK key,
LockMode lockMode)
Gets an entity via a key of this index. |
SecondaryDatabase |
getDatabase()
Returns the underlying secondary database for this index. |
EntryBinding<SK> |
getKeyBinding()
Returns the secondary key binding for the index. |
Class<SK> |
getKeyClass()
Returns the secondary key class for this index. |
Database |
getKeysDatabase()
Returns the underlying secondary database that is not associated with the primary database and is used for the keysIndex . |
PrimaryIndex<PK,E> |
getPrimaryIndex()
Returns the primary index associated with this secondary index. |
EntityCursor<K> |
keys()
Opens a cursor for traversing all keys in this index. |
EntityCursor<K> |
keys(K fromKey,
boolean fromInclusive,
K toKey,
boolean toInclusive)
Opens a cursor for traversing keys in a key range. |
EntityCursor<K> |
keys(Transaction txn,
CursorConfig config)
Opens a cursor for traversing all keys in this index. |
EntityCursor<K> |
keys(Transaction txn,
K fromKey,
boolean fromInclusive,
K toKey,
boolean toInclusive,
CursorConfig config)
Opens a cursor for traversing keys in a key range. |
EntityIndex<SK,PK> |
keysIndex()
Returns a read-only keys index that maps secondary key to primary key. |
Map<SK,E> |
map()
Returns a standard Java map based on this entity index. |
SortedMap<SK,E> |
sortedMap()
Returns a standard Java sorted map based on this entity index. |
EntityIndex<PK,E> |
subIndex(SK key)
Returns an index that maps primary key to entity for the subset of entities having a given secondary key (duplicates). |
Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object |
---|
clone, equals, finalize, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, toString, wait, wait, wait |
Constructor Detail |
---|
public SecondaryIndex(SecondaryDatabase database, Database keysDatabase, PrimaryIndex<PK,E> primaryIndex, Class<SK> secondaryKeyClass, EntryBinding<SK> secondaryKeyBinding) throws DatabaseException
EntityStore
.
When using an EntityStore
, call getSecondaryIndex
instead.
This constructor is not normally needed and is provided for
applications that wish to use custom bindings along with the Direct
Persistence Layer. Normally, getSecondaryIndex
is used instead.
database
- the secondary database used for all access other than
via a keysIndex
.keysDatabase
- another handle on the secondary database, opened
without association to the primary, and used only for access via a
keysIndex
. If this argument is null and the keysIndex
method is called, then the keys database will be opened automatically;
however, the user is then responsible for closing the keys database. To
get the keys database in order to close it, call getKeysDatabase()
.primaryIndex
- the primary index associated with this secondary
index.secondaryKeyClass
- the class of the secondary key.secondaryKeyBinding
- the binding to be used for secondary keys.
DatabaseException
Method Detail |
---|
public SecondaryDatabase getDatabase()
public Database getKeysDatabase()
keysIndex
.
public PrimaryIndex<PK,E> getPrimaryIndex()
public Class<SK> getKeyClass()
public EntryBinding<SK> getKeyBinding()
public EntityIndex<SK,PK> keysIndex() throws DatabaseException
Note the following in the unusual case that you are not
using an EntityStore
: This method will open the keys
database, a second database handle for the secondary database, if it is
not already open. In this case, if you are not using an
EntityStore
, then you are responsible for closing the
database returned by getKeysDatabase()
before closing the
environment. If you are using an EntityStore
, the
keys database will be closed automatically by EntityStore.close()
.
DatabaseException
public EntityIndex<PK,E> subIndex(SK key) throws DatabaseException
When using a MANY_TO_ONE
or MANY_TO_MANY
secondary key, the sub-index
represents the left (MANY) side of a relationship.
key
- the secondary key that identifies the entities in the
sub-index.
DatabaseException
public E get(SK key) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operation will not be transaction protected, and LockMode.DEFAULT
is used implicitly.
key
- the key to search for.
DatabaseException
public E get(Transaction txn, SK key, LockMode lockMode) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
txn
- the transaction used to protect this operation, or null
if the operation should not be transaction protected.key
- the key to search for.lockMode
- the lock mode to use for this operation, or null to
use LockMode.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
public Map<SK,E> map()
EntityIndex
StoredMap
returned is defined by the Collections API. Stored collections conform
to the standard Java collections framework interface.
public SortedMap<SK,E> sortedMap()
EntityIndex
StoredSortedMap
returned is defined by the Collections API. Stored collections conform
to the standard Java collections framework interface.
public boolean contains(K key) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operation will not be transaction protected, and LockMode.DEFAULT
is used implicitly.
contains
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
key
- the key to search for.
DatabaseException
public boolean contains(Transaction txn, K key, LockMode lockMode) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
contains
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect this operation, or null
if the operation should not be transaction protected.key
- the key to search for.lockMode
- the lock mode to use for this operation, or null to
use LockMode.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
public long count() throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
This operation is faster than obtaining a count by scanning the index manually, and will not perturb the current contents of the cache. However, the count is not guaranteed to be accurate if there are concurrent updates.
count
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
DatabaseException
public boolean delete(K key) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
Auto-commit is used implicitly if the store is transactional.
delete
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
key
- the key to search for.
DatabaseException
public boolean delete(Transaction txn, K key) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
delete
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect this operation, null to use
auto-commit, or null if the store is non-transactional.key
- the key to search for.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<K> keys() throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operations performed with the cursor will not be transaction
protected, and CursorConfig.DEFAULT
is used implicitly. If the
store is transactional, the cursor may not be used to update or delete
entities.
keys
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<K> keys(Transaction txn, CursorConfig config) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
keys
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect all operations performed with
the cursor, or null if the operations should not be transaction
protected. If null is specified and the store is transactional, the
cursor may not be used to update or delete entities.config
- the cursor configuration that determines the default lock
mode used for all cursor operations, or null to implicitly use CursorConfig.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<E> entities() throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operations performed with the cursor will not be transaction
protected, and CursorConfig.DEFAULT
is used implicitly. If the
store is transactional, the cursor may not be used to update or delete
entities.
entities
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<E> entities(Transaction txn, CursorConfig config) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
entities
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect all operations performed with
the cursor, or null if the operations should not be transaction
protected. If null is specified and the store is transactional, the
cursor may not be used to update or delete entities.config
- the cursor configuration that determines the default lock
mode used for all cursor operations, or null to implicitly use CursorConfig.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<K> keys(K fromKey, boolean fromInclusive, K toKey, boolean toInclusive) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operations performed with the cursor will not be transaction
protected, and CursorConfig.DEFAULT
is used implicitly. If the
store is transactional, the cursor may not be used to update or delete
entities.
keys
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
fromKey
- is the lower bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no lower bound.fromInclusive
- is true if keys greater than or equal to fromKey
should be included in the key range, or false if only keys greater than
fromKey should be included.toKey
- is the upper bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no upper bound.toInclusive
- is true if keys less than or equal to toKey should be
included in the key range, or false if only keys less than toKey should
be included.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<K> keys(Transaction txn, K fromKey, boolean fromInclusive, K toKey, boolean toInclusive, CursorConfig config) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
keys
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect all operations performed with
the cursor, or null if the operations should not be transaction
protected. If null is specified and the store is transactional, the
cursor may not be used to update or delete entities.fromKey
- is the lower bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no lower bound.fromInclusive
- is true if keys greater than or equal to fromKey
should be included in the key range, or false if only keys greater than
fromKey should be included.toKey
- is the upper bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no upper bound.toInclusive
- is true if keys less than or equal to toKey should be
included in the key range, or false if only keys less than toKey should
be included.config
- the cursor configuration that determines the default lock
mode used for all cursor operations, or null to implicitly use CursorConfig.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<E> entities(K fromKey, boolean fromInclusive, K toKey, boolean toInclusive) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
The operations performed with the cursor will not be transaction
protected, and CursorConfig.DEFAULT
is used implicitly. If the
store is transactional, the cursor may not be used to update or delete
entities.
entities
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
fromKey
- is the lower bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no lower bound.fromInclusive
- is true if keys greater than or equal to fromKey
should be included in the key range, or false if only keys greater than
fromKey should be included.toKey
- is the upper bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no upper bound.toInclusive
- is true if keys less than or equal to toKey should be
included in the key range, or false if only keys less than toKey should
be included.
DatabaseException
public EntityCursor<E> entities(Transaction txn, K fromKey, boolean fromInclusive, K toKey, boolean toInclusive, CursorConfig config) throws DatabaseException
EntityIndex
entities
in interface EntityIndex<K,E>
txn
- the transaction used to protect all operations performed with
the cursor, or null if the operations should not be transaction
protected. If null is specified and the store is transactional, the
cursor may not be used to update or delete entities.fromKey
- is the lower bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no lower bound.fromInclusive
- is true if keys greater than or equal to fromKey
should be included in the key range, or false if only keys greater than
fromKey should be included.toKey
- is the upper bound of the key range, or null if the range
has no upper bound.toInclusive
- is true if keys less than or equal to toKey should be
included in the key range, or false if only keys less than toKey should
be included.config
- the cursor configuration that determines the default lock
mode used for all cursor operations, or null to implicitly use CursorConfig.DEFAULT
.
DatabaseException
|
Berkeley DB version 4.8.30 |
|||||||||
PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |