<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another perplexing curiosity from the depths of Scheme macros</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jfxpt.com/2024/another-perplexing-curiosity-from-the-depths-of-scheme-macros/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jfxpt.com/2024/another-perplexing-curiosity-from-the-depths-of-scheme-macros/</link>
	<description>The search for invariants</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: That, in a word, is the corner that I'm painted into, even though this seems an incredibly obscure situation of having a top-level macro which inserts a top-level definition, which may or may not be previously defined and depends on the interpreter's inte</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2024/another-perplexing-curiosity-from-the-depths-of-scheme-macros/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>That, in a word, is the corner that I'm painted into, even though this seems an incredibly obscure situation of having a top-level macro which inserts a top-level definition, which may or may not be previously defined and depends on the interpreter's inte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfxpt.com/?p=277#comment-2987</guid>
		<description>[...] a first drafting session for my last article on the ambiguity of identifiers in macro-inserted top-level definitions in Scheme, I seemed to have become stuck on the introductory matter and lost sight of where I was going with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a first drafting session for my last article on the ambiguity of identifiers in macro-inserted top-level definitions in Scheme, I seemed to have become stuck on the introductory matter and lost sight of where I was going with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
