<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selection and other sundries for MP-WP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/</link>
	<description>The search for invariants</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Welsh</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 05:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=116#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billymg</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>billymg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=116#comment-237</guid>
		<description>&#62; But I'm of the notion that there's much room for improvement in MP-WP and it'd benefit your position as maintainer to minimize the friction of following your branch.

This is an excellent point and probably means i should be doing a better job of communication, to understand what should be a tunable knob and what should be fixed (and how). I'll have to give this some more thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; But I'm of the notion that there's much room for improvement in MP-WP and it'd benefit your position as maintainer to minimize the friction of following your branch.</p>
<p>This is an excellent point and probably means i should be doing a better job of communication, to understand what should be a tunable knob and what should be fixed (and how). I'll have to give this some more thought...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Welsh</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=116#comment-236</guid>
		<description>&gt; why not also do it for the backlinks?

As they use a fixed character, they didn't bother me the way the tiny "i" in this font did, but sure, no harm in changing them too that I can see.

&gt; removing the else block for setting error_reporting seems fine too

Without removing this, the thing flatly disobeys one's php.ini and/or wp-config.php settings leaving no way to suppress warning spew for "deprecation" and similar, at least that I found.

&gt; what do users of V software do if they want to make small tweaks to their own copies?

V here only makes more visible the trouble that already exists. Going on your own branch, whether by vpatch or just modifying in place - which so far has been pretty unavoidable here, but the idea is to shrink or at least not grow the problem - increases the pain of adopting someone else's work, and thus the overhead of collaborating with them. And this isn't inherently bad or anything; after all, it could be a sign that they're making stupid changes. But I'm of the notion that there's much room for improvement in MP-WP and it'd benefit your position as maintainer to minimize the friction of following your branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> why not also do it for the backlinks?</p>
<p>As they use a fixed character, they didn't bother me the way the tiny "i" in this font did, but sure, no harm in changing them too that I can see.</p>
<p>> removing the else block for setting error_reporting seems fine too</p>
<p>Without removing this, the thing flatly disobeys one's php.ini and/or wp-config.php settings leaving no way to suppress warning spew for "deprecation" and similar, at least that I found.</p>
<p>> what do users of V software do if they want to make small tweaks to their own copies?</p>
<p>V here only makes more visible the trouble that already exists. Going on your own branch, whether by vpatch or just modifying in place - which so far has been pretty unavoidable here, but the idea is to shrink or at least not grow the problem - increases the pain of adopting someone else's work, and thus the overhead of collaborating with them. And this isn't inherently bad or anything; after all, it could be a sign that they're making stupid changes. But I'm of the notion that there's much room for improvement in MP-WP and it'd benefit your position as maintainer to minimize the friction of following your branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billymg</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/selection-and-other-sundries-for-mp-wp/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>billymg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=116#comment-235</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;mp-wp_remove-textselectionjs-pop3-etc&lt;/em&gt; -- looks great
&lt;em&gt;mp-wp_svg-screenshots-and-errorreporting&lt;/em&gt; -- nice bug fix with the svg screenshots. removing the else block for setting error_reporting seems fine too
&lt;em&gt;mp-wp_serverside-selection&lt;/em&gt; -- hopefully we can add this at the plugin level, which seems like a more appropriate place for it.
&lt;em&gt;mp-wp_footnote-link-tweaks&lt;/em&gt; -- i like the better escaping of double quotes in this one, the second one makes sense but then why not also do it for the backlinks? it is a usability improvement (larger click area as you mentioned), but perhaps also a style consideration. which brings up something you &lt;a href="http://billymg.com/2020/04/updated-patch-code-embed-plugin-for-mp-wp/comment-page-1/#comment-115" rel="nofollow"&gt;mentioned here&lt;/a&gt;, and that is: what do users of V software do if they want to make small tweaks to their own copies? do they have to maintain a fork for every small adjustment? one could patch locally, with a "personal-config.diff", after pressing a new version, but if a new version changes code that overlaps with the customizations then the conflict would need to be manually resolved, and then "personal-config.diff" updated. Alternatively, these are all pulled into a global variable edited in wp-config.php, as you suggested for the list_style_type flag. Not really sure what the right answer is and i admit that my own workflow is more "manual" when it comes to making personal customization to my running copy of mp-wp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>mp-wp_remove-textselectionjs-pop3-etc</em> -- looks great<br />
<em>mp-wp_svg-screenshots-and-errorreporting</em> -- nice bug fix with the svg screenshots. removing the else block for setting error_reporting seems fine too<br />
<em>mp-wp_serverside-selection</em> -- hopefully we can add this at the plugin level, which seems like a more appropriate place for it.<br />
<em>mp-wp_footnote-link-tweaks</em> -- i like the better escaping of double quotes in this one, the second one makes sense but then why not also do it for the backlinks? it is a usability improvement (larger click area as you mentioned), but perhaps also a style consideration. which brings up something you <a href="http://billymg.com/2020/04/updated-patch-code-embed-plugin-for-mp-wp/comment-page-1/#comment-115" rel="nofollow">mentioned here</a>, and that is: what do users of V software do if they want to make small tweaks to their own copies? do they have to maintain a fork for every small adjustment? one could patch locally, with a "personal-config.diff", after pressing a new version, but if a new version changes code that overlaps with the customizations then the conflict would need to be manually resolved, and then "personal-config.diff" updated. Alternatively, these are all pulled into a global variable edited in wp-config.php, as you suggested for the list_style_type flag. Not really sure what the right answer is and i admit that my own workflow is more "manual" when it comes to making personal customization to my running copy of mp-wp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
