<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Errata for gbw-node drafts to date, and Bitcoin txid collisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/</link>
	<description>The search for invariants</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gales Bitcoin Wallet (re)release &#171; Fixpoint</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Gales Bitcoin Wallet (re)release &#171; Fixpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=85#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>[...] Errata discovered in my previous drafts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Errata discovered in my previous drafts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Welsh</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=85#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I get the same results in your examples; perhaps it's only when summing a column:


mysql&gt; select sum(x) from (select 1 as x) as temp;
+--------+
&#124; sum(x) &#124;
+--------+
&#124;      1 &#124;
+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&gt; select sum(x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;
+--------+
&#124; sum(x) &#124;
+--------+
&#124;   NULL &#124;
+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&gt; select sum(0+x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;
+----------+
&#124; sum(0+x) &#124;
+----------+
&#124;     NULL &#124;
+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&gt; select 0+sum(x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;
+----------+
&#124; 0+sum(x) &#124;
+----------+
&#124;     NULL &#124;
+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)



&gt; What happens if you deploy the cheap, self-obvious fix that's fitted to the other's idiocy, rather than trying to forever and no matter what speak your own mental language to everyone ?

A happy ending I'd imagine, if at the cost of having to study the other's idiocy in depth for the cheap fix to become obvious. Which strikes me as something you work at quite a bit.

The link calls to mind &lt;a href="https://fablesofaesop.com/the-fox-and-the-stork.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;the fox and the stork&lt;/a&gt;. Though now I wanna know what the hedgehog did!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the same results in your examples; perhaps it's only when summing a column:</p>
<p>mysql> select sum(x) from (select 1 as x) as temp;<br />
+--------+<br />
| sum(x) |<br />
+--------+<br />
|      1 |<br />
+--------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql> select sum(x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;<br />
+--------+<br />
| sum(x) |<br />
+--------+<br />
|   NULL |<br />
+--------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql> select sum(0+x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;<br />
+----------+<br />
| sum(0+x) |<br />
+----------+<br />
|     NULL |<br />
+----------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql> select 0+sum(x) from (select 1 as x limit 0) as temp;<br />
+----------+<br />
| 0+sum(x) |<br />
+----------+<br />
|     NULL |<br />
+----------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>> What happens if you deploy the cheap, self-obvious fix that's fitted to the other's idiocy, rather than trying to forever and no matter what speak your own mental language to everyone ?</p>
<p>A happy ending I'd imagine, if at the cost of having to study the other's idiocy in depth for the cheap fix to become obvious. Which strikes me as something you work at quite a bit.</p>
<p>The link calls to mind <a href="https://fablesofaesop.com/the-fox-and-the-stork.html" rel="nofollow">the fox and the stork</a>. Though now I wanna know what the hedgehog did!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=85#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&#62; though having to use this as boilerplate around every use of SUM is not exactly satisfying 

Not that I can reproduce the item on mysql's notion of sql, 

mysql&#62; select sum("");
+---------+
&#124; sum("") &#124;
+---------+
&#124;       0 &#124;
+---------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&#62; select sum(0);
+--------+
&#124; sum(0) &#124;
+--------+
&#124;      0 &#124;
+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&#62; select sum("1");
+----------+
&#124; sum("1") &#124;
+----------+
&#124;        1 &#124;
+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql&#62; select sum("q");
+----------+
&#124; sum("q") &#124;
+----------+
&#124;        0 &#124;
+----------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

But... what happens if you type out your sum as SUM(0+...) rather than SUM(...) ?

I don't merely ask because I am trying to provide the immediate solution ; and I certainly do not ask in that exact form because I am merely trying to provide the immediate solution.

What happens if you deploy the cheap, self-obvious fix that's fitted to the other's idiocy, rather than trying to forever and no matter what &lt;a href="http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2018-06-15#1825760" rel="nofollow"&gt;speak your own mental language&lt;/a&gt; to everyone ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; though having to use this as boilerplate around every use of SUM is not exactly satisfying </p>
<p>Not that I can reproduce the item on mysql's notion of sql, </p>
<p>mysql&gt; select sum("");<br />
+---------+<br />
| sum("") |<br />
+---------+<br />
|       0 |<br />
+---------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql&gt; select sum(0);<br />
+--------+<br />
| sum(0) |<br />
+--------+<br />
|      0 |<br />
+--------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql&gt; select sum("1");<br />
+----------+<br />
| sum("1") |<br />
+----------+<br />
|        1 |<br />
+----------+<br />
1 row in set (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>mysql&gt; select sum("q");<br />
+----------+<br />
| sum("q") |<br />
+----------+<br />
|        0 |<br />
+----------+<br />
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)</p>
<p>But... what happens if you type out your sum as SUM(0+...) rather than SUM(...) ?</p>
<p>I don't merely ask because I am trying to provide the immediate solution ; and I certainly do not ask in that exact form because I am merely trying to provide the immediate solution.</p>
<p>What happens if you deploy the cheap, self-obvious fix that's fitted to the other's idiocy, rather than trying to forever and no matter what <a href="http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2018-06-15#1825760" rel="nofollow">speak your own mental language</a> to everyone ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draft gbw-node frontend, part 1 &#171; Fixpoint</title>
		<link>http://jfxpt.com/2020/errata-for-gbw-node-drafts-to-date-and-bitcoin-txid-collisions/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Draft gbw-node frontend, part 1 &#171; Fixpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/?p=85#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] for errata. I'm just now noticing these were added in 2.7, ugh... sorry, 2.6 users. [^]My blog will be going [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for errata. I'm just now noticing these were added in 2.7, ugh... sorry, 2.6 users. [^]My blog will be going [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
